Dripify Pricing Explained, From $39 Annual to $99 Advanced
Dripify costs $59 to $99 per user monthly, or $39 on annual billing. See what Basic leaves out, how seats add up, and when the Pro tier is worth paying for.
How much does Dripify cost?
On monthly billing, Dripify is $59 per user per month on Basic, $79 on Pro and $99 on Advanced, with Enterprise priced on request, as Dripify's own pricing page lists it. Pay twelve months upfront and Basic falls to $39 per user per month. Every figure is per seat, so two people means double.
| Plan | Monthly per user | What changes at this tier | Who it suits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | $59 ($39 billed annually) | One drip campaign, lower quotas | One person running one sequence |
| Pro | $79 | Unlimited campaigns | Anyone running more than one audience |
| Advanced | $99 | Top published tier | Teams who hit the Pro ceiling |
| Enterprise | Custom | Negotiated | Larger teams with many seats |
Two seats on Pro is $158 a month, $1,896 a year. A third adds $948 a year. There is no card required to start a trial and no setup fee, per Dripify's FAQ, so the cheapest way to find out whether Basic's quotas fit your daily invite volume is to run the trial before you pick a tier.
Why is the advertised price $39 and the price on the invoice $59?
Because $39 is the annual rate, charged upfront for a full year, and it is a per-seat rate. Emelia's breakdown makes the same point: two things are missing from the $39 number. Monthly billing is $59. So the comparison is $468 a year per person paid in one payment, against $708 paid $59 at a time.
That gap is $240 a year per seat, or about 34% off. If you are looking for a Dripify coupon, the annual toggle is the discount. For a founder who is still testing whether LinkedIn works for their offer, $59 a month for three months is $177 at risk. The annual plan is $468 at risk, and cancelling in month two does not get it back.
What does the Basic plan at $59 leave out?
One drip campaign and lower quotas, as this hands-on review sets out. Pro at $79 is where campaigns become unlimited. That single-campaign limit is the thing most people discover after paying, because it does not sound restrictive until you have two audiences.
Here is what it means in practice. You want to message heads of RevOps at 200-person SaaS companies with one angle, and agency founders with a completely different one. On Basic you pick one, or you merge both into a sequence generic enough to cover both, which is the fastest way to push your accept rate below the 20 to 30% range we see on well-targeted invites. Recruiters hit this immediately, since candidate outreach and client outreach are two different sequences with two different tones, which is part of why we wrote up candidate outreach separately.
If the sending account is brand new, the quota difference between tiers does not matter for the first fortnight anyway. Safe volume on a fresh account is 5 to 10 invites a day, rising to 20 to 25 once it is warm, and no plan raises that ceiling.
Which tier do people actually end up paying for?
Pro or Advanced. Dripify starts at $59, and the tiers people doing real volume settle on are the $79 and $99 ones. If you built your budget on the $39 headline and land on Pro monthly, you are paying $79 instead of $39, which is $480 more per seat per year.
So the planning number for one person doing real outbound is $79 a month, not $39. For four seats that is $316 a month, $3,792 a year. The $39 figure is accurate for exactly one situation: one person, one campaign, paid a year in advance.
What does Dripify cost for a three-person team?
Three seats on Pro at $79 is $237 a month, or $2,844 a year. Three seats on Basic billed annually is $1,404 charged upfront in one payment. Three on Advanced is $297 a month. Adding a fourth person in month seven adds $79 a month, and seats are the variable that moves this bill, not features.
Two things to check before you commit a year. First, whether all three people will still be sending in month nine, because a paused seat is still a paid seat. Second, whether each person needs their own LinkedIn account sending, or whether one account sending 20 to 25 invites a day is already more replies than anyone is answering. Buy the fourth seat before you have a list to feed it and you are paying $79 a month for an account sending 5 invites a day.
What is not in the price at all?
Your hours. Dripify automates the sending and the follow-ups. You still build the list, write the copy, answer every reply, handle the objections and book the meeting. At $79 a month that work is the larger line item, and it never appears on the invoice.
Run the volume. 25 invites a day for 20 working days is 500 invites a month. At a 20 to 30% accept rate that is 100 to 150 new connections. At a 12 to 18% first-message reply rate, that is 12 to 27 replies from the opener, plus 5 to 8% on the follow-ups. Call it 25 to 35 live conversations a month, each one worth roughly 20 minutes spread across a few days of back and forth. That is 10 hours, plus list building and copy, so 15 to 20 hours a month. At $50 an hour, $750 to $1,000 sitting on top of the $79.
What does $79 a month get you in meetings?
At 500 invites a month and a 3 to 5% meeting rate on invites, that is 15 to 25 meetings. On the invoice, $79 divided by 20 meetings is about $4 a meeting. Add 18 hours of your own time at $50 an hour and the same meeting costs about $49.
Those are our published benchmarks for LinkedIn outreach, and the tool doing the sending is not what moves them. Targeting moves them, and so does what people see when they click your name before deciding whether to accept. If your accept rate is sitting at 8%, no tier of Dripify fixes that, and rewriting your headline is a cheaper experiment than upgrading from $79 to $99.
Who should pay for Dripify, and who should not?
If you have a person whose job is outreach and they need a sequencer that sends and follows up reliably, $79 a month is a fair price and Dripify is a reasonable buy. If you are a solo founder with no time to answer 30 conversations a month, the $79 is the smallest number in the decision and the tool will not help with the big one.
Concretely. Two SDRs already doing this work by hand, spending 15 hours a week each? Buy them Pro seats and you have bought back most of the sending time for $158 a month. One founder, no SDR, 500 invites a month? You have bought a machine that generates 25 conversations you do not have time to hold. A prospect who accepted your invite, asked a pricing question and waited four days will not answer the next campaign either.
If you are not sure LinkedIn is the right channel for your buyer at all, the tier question is premature and the comparison between outbound, inbound and paid is the earlier decision.
What are the alternatives at this price?
Other LinkedIn sequencers sit in the same $59 to $99 per seat band and make the same trade: they send, you reply. The other category is an AI SDR, which takes the replies as well as the sending. That changes which line item you are buying down, the $79 or the 18 hours.
Gelee is in that second group. It runs LinkedIn outreach, answers replies in your voice, handles objections from your playbook and books the meeting, with a 15-minute setup and no self-serve signup, and pricing is shared on a demo call. There is a Post Commenters preset that DMs everyone who comments on a watched post, then replies publicly once the DM has gone out. If you already employ the person who answers replies, Gelee is a worse fit than a $79 seat and you should buy the $79 seat. If the person answering replies at 11pm is you, a $79 seat adds 25 conversations to that hour.