New The infrastructure of cold email has come to LinkedIn. See how it works →
Your market is moving
Curious what your LinkedIn TAM is? See it live on a call.
Book a discovery call →
← Back to Blog
ManyChat Doesn't Work on LinkedIn. Here's How to Get the Same Thing.
Guide7 minAug 9, 2026

ManyChat Doesn't Work on LinkedIn. Here's How to Get the Same Thing.

ManyChat runs Instagram, WhatsApp and TikTok, and has never supported LinkedIn. The comment-to-DM mechanic transfers anyway. Here is how it works on LinkedIn and what to watch for.

Does ManyChat work on LinkedIn?

No, and it never has. ManyChat runs on Instagram, Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, TikTok, Telegram, SMS and email. LinkedIn is not on the list and is not on the public roadmap. If you searched for this hoping to connect the two, that is the short answer, and no amount of configuring will change it.

You can wire ManyChat to LinkedIn through Zapier, Make or Albato, but read carefully what that actually does. It moves data between the two after the fact. It does not let ManyChat read a LinkedIn comment or send a LinkedIn DM, because ManyChat has no LinkedIn messaging integration to hang that on.

What are people actually asking for?

The mechanic, not the brand. Almost nobody wants ManyChat itself on LinkedIn. They want the thing ManyChat made famous on Instagram:

You post something. You say "comment GUIDE and I'll send it over." People comment. Every one of them gets the thing in their DMs within a minute, and the whole comment section fills up with proof that it works.

That loop is why it spread, and how comment-to-DM automation actually works(opens in a new tab) breaks the sequence down step by step. The public comments are social proof, the DM is the delivery, and the reply rate is high because the person raised their hand first. None of that is Instagram-specific. It works anywhere people comment in public and message in private, which very much includes LinkedIn.

Why does the mechanic work so well?

Because the person asked first, which flips the whole dynamic of outbound. A cold LinkedIn DM interrupts someone. A DM that arrives ten seconds after they typed "GUIDE" under your post is something they requested, and they are sitting there waiting for it.

It also compounds in public, which is why the comment-to-DM loop(opens in a new tab) works at all. Every comment is visible to that person's network, so the post keeps getting pushed while the DMs go out quietly underneath. One post does the reach and the conversion at the same time.

How do you get comment-to-DM on LinkedIn?

You need a LinkedIn-native tool, because the automation has to read comments and send DMs on LinkedIn itself. A few exist now. Gelee is one, and there are others like Saylink and LeadShark built around the same idea. We compare all three in ManyChat alternatives for LinkedIn(opens in a new tab).

What matters when you pick one: can it tell whether it is allowed to DM that person, what does it do when it cannot, and does it say the same thing under every single comment. Is any of this safe?(opens in a new tab) is the other question worth asking.

How does Gelee do it?

You pick Post Commenters from the campaign library, paste in your post URLs, and launch. From there every new commenter goes through the same short sequence:

1. Check first. Can we actually DM this person? If they have already sent you an invite, accept it, which often unlocks the DM.

2. Send the DM. The resource, in your voice.

3. Reply publicly, but only if the DM sent. Something like "just sent you a DM."

4. If we cannot DM them, the public reply asks them to connect instead, and they get picked up once they do.

New posts get swept every hour for their first 48 hours, then daily, because that is when comments actually arrive.

Why does the order of those steps matter?

Because the alternative is publicly claiming something you did not do. If the tool replies "just sent you a DM" and the DM silently failed, that lie is sitting in your comment section under your real name, and the person it was aimed at can see it.

The public reply is conditional on a confirmed DM. Not on being allowed to DM, on the message actually going out. It is a small distinction that decides whether your comment section is proof or embarrassment.

Will every comment get the same reply?

Not with a decent tool, and this is the part people underestimate. Your public replies stack up in your own comment section under your own name, so twenty identical "just sent you a DM!" replies look automated to every human scrolling past, and are trivial for LinkedIn to spot.

Gelee ships about 50 written variations of the "sent it" reply and about 42 of the "connect first" reply, and picks per comment. The variants are written by people and approved before they ship, so nothing gets generated live and nothing has to be checked after the fact.

Is this allowed on LinkedIn?

Nothing here is against LinkedIn's rules by itself, because you are replying to people who publicly asked you for something. The risk is volume and repetition, which is what LinkedIn's automated detection is actually tuned for.

Stay inside normal messaging limits, do not send the same string every time, and do not run this on a brand new account. A tool that ignores those three things is a risk to your account no matter how good its copy is.

Should you use ManyChat or a LinkedIn tool?

If your audience is on Instagram or WhatsApp, use ManyChat. It is very good and this post is not an argument against it.

If your buyers are on LinkedIn, you need something built for LinkedIn, because ManyChat cannot reach them there and a Zapier bridge does not change that. The mechanic transfers. The tool does not.

Get new posts by email

What is working on LinkedIn outbound right now, with the numbers behind it. No pitch, and one link to unsubscribe in every email.

Gelee AI

Signal-based LinkedIn outbound.

Sounds like you. Books meetings 24/7. 20-min setup.

See pricing →Book a demo