New You can now talk to your Gelee agent from Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor through our MCP. Read the docs →
← Back to Blog
Which LinkedIn Outreach Tool Fits Your Actual Send Volume
Guide8 minSep 26, 2026

Which LinkedIn Outreach Tool Fits Your Actual Send Volume

Dux-Soup, Dripify, Expandi and HeyReach split into browser, cloud and multi-account tools. Here is which one matches your invite volume and reply load.

Which LinkedIn outreach tools do people keep landing on?

The same seven names show up on almost every tested list: Dux-Soup, Dripify, Linked Helper, Expandi, Octopus CRM, HeyReach and Waalaxy, which is the set Dux-Soup's guide names as the most widely used(opens in a new tab). They split three ways by where the sending actually happens, and that split decides which one you should buy.

+Browser extensions. Dux-Soup, Octopus CRM and Linked Helper run inside Chrome on your machine. Cheap, and your laptop has to be open for anything to send.
+Cloud tools. Expandi runs in the cloud on a dedicated IP(opens in a new tab) rather than inside your browser. Sends whether or not you are at your desk.
+Multi-account platforms. HeyReach is built around running many LinkedIn senders at once, with webhook integrations aimed at agencies and mid-market teams.

These lists score on interface, price and deliverability. One reviewer ran outreach through 20 or more of them in a single year(opens in a new tab) and ranked them that way. All seven stop at the send. The reply that arrives two hours later is still yours to write.

Two people reviewing paperwork between open laptops. Photo by Helloquence, CC0.

Two people reviewing paperwork between open laptops. Photo by Helloquence, CC0.

Is Dripify the right pick if LinkedIn is your only channel?

If you send under 200 invites a month, answer your own replies, and want a sequence builder you can learn in an afternoon, Dripify does that job. Founders comparing these tools on r/Entrepreneur pick it when LinkedIn is the only channel they run(opens in a new tab).

At that size the numbers stay manageable. 200 invites a month at a 20 to 30% accept rate is 40 to 60 new connections, 12 to 18% of whom reply to your first message, which is 6 to 10 conversations a week and 6 to 10 meetings a month at a 3 to 5% meeting rate.

Where it stops helping is volume. Push the same three-step sequence to 500 invites a month and you get 60 to 90 first-message replies landing in your LinkedIn inbox, each needing a human answer within a few hours. Dripify sent them. It will not answer them.

Is WarmySender at $7 a seat actually the best value?

On the invoice, yes. Founders running email and LinkedIn together keep landing on WarmySender at $7 a seat(opens in a new tab), and ten seats is $70 a month. No other tool in this category gets near that number. If you already have an SDR on payroll, buy it and stop reading comparison posts.

The arithmetic changes when you are the one clicking. 25 invites a day is roughly 20 minutes of review and personalisation, and the replies take another 30 to 40 minutes. Call it an hour a day, 20 hours a month. At $50 an hour that is $1,000 of your time sitting on top of a $70 invoice. At $100 an hour it is $2,000. We worked the full version of this in when a cheap LinkedIn seat stops being cheap(opens in a new tab).

What is the difference between Expandi, HeyReach and a browser extension?

Expandi runs in the cloud on a dedicated IP, so campaigns keep sending overnight. HeyReach is built for multiple sender accounts under one dashboard, which matters if you run five clients or five founders in one company. Dux-Soup and Octopus CRM run in your browser and cost less, and they stop when your laptop sleeps.

The laptop is the practical test. A browser extension sending 25 invites a day only sends while Chrome is open and you are logged in, so two days of client meetings with the lid shut costs you 50 invites. Over a month that turns 500 invites into around 350, and at a 3 to 5% meeting rate you gave up 4 to 7 meetings.

Agencies almost always end up on HeyReach or Expandi, because the alternative is logging into eight client machines every morning. A solo consultant with one LinkedIn account gets nothing from multi-sender architecture and should not pay for it.

How many invites a day can you actually send?

LinkedIn does not publish a daily limit, and the real ceiling moves with account age, your accept rate and how many people mark you as spam. Our own numbers across campaigns: 20 to 25 invites a day on a warmed account, and 5 to 10 a day for the first two weeks on a new one. Tools advertising 100 a day are describing a restricted account.

Run the funnel at 500 invites a month:

+20 to 30% accept, so 100 to 150 new connections
+12 to 18% reply to the first message, so 60 to 90 conversations
+3 to 5% of invites become meetings, so 15 to 25 meetings

The bottleneck sits in the middle line. If your accept rate is coming in under 20%, the problem is usually your headline and profile rather than your copy, and the LinkedIn headline rewriter(opens in a new tab) fixes that in five minutes.

Taking notes next to a laptop at a shared table. Photo by Startup Stock Photos, CC0.

Taking notes next to a laptop at a shared table. Photo by Startup Stock Photos, CC0.

What do none of these tools do?

They send, sequence and track. None of them answers a reply in your voice, handles "we already use a competitor" the way you would on a call, or books the meeting without you touching the keyboard. Dripify, Expandi, HeyReach and Waalaxy all hand the conversation back to you the moment a prospect responds.

A few things worth knowing before you buy any of them:

+Comment-to-DM works properly in very few of them, and we tested which LinkedIn automation tools actually do comment-to-DM(opens in a new tab).
+Sales Navigator is a separate $99-ish subscription on top of most of these, because that is where the filters live.
+Multi-channel platforms like Lemlist and Meet Alfred add email and phone steps to the same sequence(opens in a new tab), which helps if your buyers ignore LinkedIn and adds work if they do not.

Which tool suits which situation?

Pick on who answers the replies and how many LinkedIn accounts you run. Dripify or a browser extension works for one account under 200 invites a month when you answer replies yourself. HeyReach handles five or more sender accounts. Expandi keeps one account sending overnight. An AI SDR covers 60 replies a month you cannot get to.

ToolBuilt forWho it suits
DripifyClean LinkedIn-only sequence builderSolo founder under 200 invites a month, answering own replies
WarmySenderEmail plus LinkedIn at $7 a seatTeam with an SDR already on payroll
ExpandiCloud sending on a dedicated IPOne or two accounts, campaigns running overnight
HeyReachMany sender accounts, one dashboardAgencies running five or more client accounts
Dux-Soup / Octopus CRMBrowser extension, lowest priceTesting outbound for the first month
GeleeLinkedIn-native AI SDR, replies and bookingFounder with no one to answer 60+ replies a month

The last row is the one people argue with. At 500 invites a month you get 60 to 90 first-message replies, plus a 5 to 8% reply rate on follow-ups to everyone who connected and went quiet. That is around four live conversations a day, each needing an answer before the prospect forgets who you are.

Which one should you buy?

If you have two SDRs, buy HeyReach or Expandi and give them a better tool, because the hours are already covered. If you are testing whether LinkedIn works for you at all, spend $7 to $50 and send 100 invites yourself first. If you are a founder generating 60 to 90 replies a month and answering them between customer calls, the tool is not your problem.

We laid out the full version of this logic in why the best LinkedIn automation tool depends on who answers replies(opens in a new tab). Sequence builders look roughly the same in every screenshot on every comparison page. The line that changes your month is how many unanswered conversations are sitting in your inbox on a Friday afternoon.

When is Gelee the wrong choice?

When you want to sign up tonight and send tomorrow. Gelee has no self-serve signup, so you book a call and get set up in 15 minutes. Dripify or Waalaxy will have you sending within an hour of paying, and if you are still finding out whether 100 invites produce two or three replies, run that test this week instead.

Gelee is also wrong if your buyers are not on LinkedIn, if you sell to consumers rather than businesses, or if you already employ someone whose job is replying to prospects. It is built for the founder running outreach alone, where the AI writes in your voice, handles objections from your playbook, books the meeting, and runs the Post Commenters preset that DMs everyone who comments on a watched post and then replies to them publicly once the DM is confirmed sent. Pricing is shared on a demo call.

Get new posts by email

What is working on LinkedIn outbound right now, with the numbers behind it. No pitch, and one link to unsubscribe in every email.

Gelee AI

Signal-based LinkedIn outbound.

We find the buyers, write in your voice, and answer the replies. You take the meetings.

Book a Demo